Plos One Decision in Process Taking Forever After Reviews
Your peer-review timeline
Fix article materials
Our Author Guidelines explicate how to prepare for submission.
Submit article
Almost journals apply off-the-shelf software you'll recognize. It's clunky, frustrating and feels decades onetime! PeerJ is custom designed and developed in-firm, using the same modern tools and approach every bit Google and Facebook.
And similar these modern websites, we prioritize making submitting as easy and enjoyable equally possible. Submitting your article doesn't have to be painful!
A recent writer annotate:
The online interface for submitting the paper was THE All-time submission interface I have always used. I wish all journals would apply this interface. Clean. Easy. No bugs. Loved it!
Preview submission interface
Article checks
Staff bank check your article to make sure you have submitted everything correctly.
Many articles fail these checks the first time round then don't worry if this happens to you!
Desk-bound reject
Know within days (not weeks or months) if your manuscript can be published at PeerJ. For example if your commodity is out of scope, does non have the required ethical approvals, does not meet our publishing quality requirements etc.
Tweak submission and resubmit
The majority of authors resubmit their articles within a few hours.
Article checks laissez passer
24-hour interval 0
Editor assigned to article
We identify the nigh advisable editor to handle your submission, selected from our 1,709-member editorial board.
If none of the relevant academic editors agree to handle your submission, nosotros volition unfortunately have no pick only to render information technology to you. This is non a rejection, but rather nosotros must decline to handle it - which is simply a function of being unable to find a editor on the board to handle it.
Day 2-7
Editor recruits reviewers
Your editor identifies potential reviewers and personally invites them to review your submission. Almost editors recruit 2 reviewers, but sometimes more may be required.
Reviewers review your article
Your reviewers are supplied with everything they need to complete a thorough review of your submission. Happy reviewers evangelize great, effective reviews. And our reviewing workflow has been built from the ground up to make your reviewers' work as easy, well-supported and enjoyable as possible.
Editor makes offset decision
If your commodity receives a major or small-scale revision decision, it is highly likely your article will somewhen be published.
Day 30
Revise article and resubmit
You receive your review feedback and requested changes from your editor and reviewers, and revise your submission.
With each resubmission you are required to submit a rebuttal alphabetic character and a version of your manuscript highlighting the changes y'all take made.
Editor makes side by side decision
Revise and resubmit
The number of times you'll need to resubmit earlier your accept conclusion depends on a number of factors. Near submissions are accepted later on 1 or 2 revisions.
Editor makes have decision
Your editor decides that your article is prepare for publication.
Production checks
Now that we know your article is to exist published, staff need to complete final checks to make certain our typesetters have everything they need to produce your article PDF.
Production tasks
You may need to upload additional high-quality images, or make other tweaks highlighted by staff in product checks.
This is as well when many authors submit their payment.
Commodity proof created
The first version of your terminal PDF is created.
Proof check your article
Y'all have roughly 24 hours to proof check your article PDF to spot any minor corrections needed.
Staff proof check
Staff complete a final proof check sweep of your article.
Concluding version of PDF created
The last version of your article PDF is created, and scheduled for publication.
We volition let you know in advance of when your article will be published.
Article published
Day 74 (median)
Disseminate your research
Publishing your commodity marks the start of its dissemination journey. The more yous share information technology within the first half-dozen-12 months, the more than views and citations information technology volition receive.
PeerJ helps yous practise this with your Impact Toolkit - a collection of tasks, tools and information resources to help yous share your research.
Nosotros also actively share our articles with our printing contacts, through our social media accounts, and on our web log. Read more virtually this on our Broad audition page.
Milestone email alerts
Nosotros'll email you when y'all commodity reaches fundamental view, download and citation milestones.
Source: https://peerj.com/benefits/peer-review-timeline/
0 Response to "Plos One Decision in Process Taking Forever After Reviews"
Postar um comentário